Michael McClain | Alternative Investment Research Analyst and Due Diligence
Last Updated: April 14, 2026
Asset-Based Lending
While headlines related to private credit’s direct lending sector have captivated market participants over the past month, there exists a meaningful investment universe, each with distinct characteristics, under this broader umbrella. Following direct lending, the asset-based lending (ABL) industry has experienced consistent growth and renewed investor interest.
ABL is a form of lending in which loans are primarily secured by a borrower’s tangible assets rather than by cash flow or earnings. Common forms of collateral include accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and, in some cases, intellectual property. ABL is most often used by middle-market companies with meaningful working capital needs, seasonal cash flow patterns, or business models where asset values provide more reliable support than earnings. As many ABL borrowers are capital-intensive businesses, there exist working capital gaps and seasonality related to inventory builds that ABL lenders can bridge. This financing is not related to poor operations, rather, how certain firms convert assets into cash over time. The amount a borrower can access is typically determined by a borrowing base, which applies an advance rate to eligible assets and adjusts as collateral values change. From a structural perspective, ABL typically sits senior in the capital structure and benefits from first-priority liens on collateral. This seniority and asset coverage often results in lower loss severity and stronger recovery rates in stressed scenarios compared with unsecured or cash flow-based lending.
ABL vs. Direct Lending: Risk, Liquidity, and Cycle Sensitivity
Risk: At a high level, the main difference between direct lending and ABL centers on the type of risk a lender is underwriting. Direct lending focuses on cash-flow lending to middle-market firms, with credit risk primarily assessed on EBITDA, free cash flow, and margin stability. In contrast, ABL considers the age and quality of accounts receivable, liquidation value, and inventory turnover. Meaningful risk will always be present in both; however, the origins of any credit problems will be unique.
Liquidity: ABL portfolios feature shorter loan durations and self-liquidating structures. In contrast, direct lending is often characterized by longer-dated loans tied to sponsor-backed transactions, where exit timing depends heavily on refinancing or merger and acquisition markets.
Cycle Sensitivity: Earlier in an economic cycle, direct lending often benefits from expanding leverage capacity, stable or growing EBITDA, and accommodative refinancing conditions. In these environments, cash‑flow‑based underwriting can support returns as sponsors pursue growth and acquisition activity. However, later in a cycle, earnings volatility typically increases, refinancing windows narrow, and forecasting future cash flows becomes more challenging. While ABL may offer slightly lower yields than direct lending, it may provide more downside risk mitigation and greater resilience across economic cycles. As a result, ABL is often viewed as a defensive or stabilizing strategy within the broader private credit market, particularly during periods of economic uncertainty.
LPL Research Takeaway
From a portfolio construction standpoint, we believe both direct lending and ABL may provide attractive risk/return profiles for suitable investors and offer complementary characteristics. Neither is inherently superior; rather, investors should consider which private credit sector best aligns with their goals, provides portfolio diversification, and meets their liquidity needs. ABL may serve as a stabilizing complement to traditional direct lending, potentially smoothing volatility, and enhancing downside risk mitigation in late-cycle environments. ABL appears well positioned, not as a replacement for direct lending, but as a differentiated tool within the larger private credit universe.
Looking ahead, in the same manner that investors consider which public equity or bond styles/sectors are more appropriate at a given point in the market cycle; when investing in private markets, product development has evolved to the point where investors may tailor their desired exposure, rather than relying on one-stop solutions featuring broad private market beta.
Important Disclosures
This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, please consult your financial professional prior to investing.
Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee return or eliminate risk.
Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.
This material was prepared by LPL Financial, LLC. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.
Unless otherwise stated LPL Financial and the third party persons and firms mentioned are not affiliates of each other and make no representation with respect to each other. Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of their products or services.
Asset Class Disclosures –
International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.
Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity.
Municipal bonds are subject and market and interest rate risk and potentially capital gains tax if sold prior to maturity. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Municipal bonds are federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply.
Preferred stock dividends are paid at the discretion of the issuing company. Preferred stocks are subject to interest rate and credit risk. They may be subject to a call features.
Alternative investments may not be suitable for all investors and involve special risks such as leveraging the investment, potential adverse market forces, regulatory changes and potentially illiquidity. The strategies employed in the management of alternative investments may accelerate the velocity of potential losses.
Mortgage backed securities are subject to credit, default, prepayment, extension, market and interest rate risk.
High yield/junk bonds (grade BB or below) are below investment grade securities, and are subject to higher interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks than those graded BBB and above. They generally should be part of a diversified portfolio for sophisticated investors.
Precious metal investing involves greater fluctuation and potential for losses.
The fast price swings of commodities will result in significant volatility in an investor’s holdings.
This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial LLC.
Not Insured by FDIC/NCUA or Any Other Government Agency | Not Bank/Credit Union Deposits or Obligations | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value
For Public Use – Tracking: #1090738
