The Return of the Stock Picker’s Market
Adam Turnquist | Chief Technical Strategist
Last Updated: February 17, 2026
If you judged the S&P 500 solely by its flat year-to-date performance, you may assume it has been an uneventful year for the U.S. equity market. However, underneath the surface of the market is a much different story, as individual stocks are charting increasingly independent paths. Several key factors are driving the dispersion.
First, the economy is creating uneven sector performance as different industries face an evolving set of tailwinds and headwinds. For most of 2025, stocks with artificial intelligence (AI) exposure attracted steady inflows, fueled by optimism around productivity gains, robust earnings growth, and rising capital expenditures. However, the narrative began to change last fall as percolating AI bubble fears transformed into concerns over AI disruption — as discussed in LPL Research’s February 17 Weekly Market Commentary. As investors have more recently discovered, the perceived threat of traditional business models being displaced by accelerating AI capabilities has created a growing list of winners and losers well beyond the software sector.
Second, the rotation out of big tech has underpinned sizable capital flows into value-oriented stocks, small caps, and international equities. Since the tech sector represents roughly one‑third of the S&P 500, this shift has created a “drinking water from a fire hose” effect for many smaller segments of the market absorbing these outsized inflows.
Third, an improving economic backdrop supported by the resumption of the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) rate-cutting cycle, easing inflation pressures, and pro-growth policies from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) supported broadening growth beyond big tech. The S&P 493, which excludes the Magnificent (“Mag”) Seven names Alphabet (GOOG/L), Amazon (AAPL), Apple (AAPL), Meta (META), Microsoft (MSFT), NVIDIA (NVDA), and Tesla (TSLA), is projected to grow full-year 2026 earnings per share (EPS) by nearly 14%, up from an estimated 10% in 2025 (Bloomberg).
Fourth, accelerating flows into actively managed funds are directing more capital into individual stocks rather than broad index vehicles. While passive funds still represent 64% of all equity assets under management, demand for active equity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) has surged. According to J.P. Morgan Asset Management data, active U.S. equity ETFs now account for 32% of all ETF flows, up from only 6% in 2021.
The rising dispersion in returns and relatively low correlation among S&P 500 stocks has become increasingly apparent on the CBOE S&P 500 Dispersion Index and the CBOE Three-Month Implied Correlation Index. The dispersion index, which has climbed to near multi-month highs, compares the prices of S&P 500 constituent stock options and S&P 500 Index options to quantify market expectations for how differently individual stocks are likely to perform relative to each other. A higher index level implies higher expectations for wider deviations in returns within the S&P 500, and with higher dispersion comes more opportunities for alpha generation (finding winners vs. benchmarks) via active management. The correlation index quantifies the expected average correlation among S&P 500 stocks over a rolling three-month period. Higher readings imply higher expectations for stocks to move more in tandem, while lower values (like now) suggest the market is pricing in more idiosyncratic moves within the S&P 500.
High Dispersion and Low Correlation Create Opportunities for Active Management
Source: LPL Research, Bloomberg 02/13/25
Disclosures: Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
From Worst to First
Dispersion is showing up across S&P 500 sectors as well, with this year’s performance trends flipping last year’s script. Many of 2025’s laggards are now leading, while several of last year’s top performers are trailing. One notable exception is industrials, which has climbed 12% year to date and continues to outperform the broader market.
The energy sector, representing only 3.2% of the S&P 500, has been the standout, gaining 21.3% as of February 13. The surge has been fueled by substantial inflows, with energy‑focused ETFs pulling in $6.3 billion in January alone. That marks the largest single month of inflows to the sector in Bloomberg’s 10‑year dataset, providing a clear example of the “drinking water from a fire hose” effect described earlier.
S&P 500 Sector Performance Comparison
Source: LPL Research, Bloomberg 02/16/25
Disclosure: Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Conclusion
The U.S. equity market may look steady on the surface but rising dispersion and falling correlations among S&P 500 stocks reveal a far more dynamic environment beneath. Shifts in the AI narrative, rotations out of mega‑cap tech, improving economic conditions, and accelerating inflows into active strategies are all driving performance gaps across sectors, with more value-tilted and economically sensitive sectors emerging as early 2026 winners. Against this backdrop, investors may benefit from active management, selective stock picking, and sector‑rotation strategies designed to capitalize on broader dispersion and the increased opportunities it presents.
Important Disclosures
This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, please consult your financial professional prior to investing.
Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee return or eliminate risk.
Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.
This material was prepared by LPL Financial, LLC. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.
Unless otherwise stated LPL Financial and the third party persons and firms mentioned are not affiliates of each other and make no representation with respect to each other. Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of their products or services.
Asset Class Disclosures –
International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.
Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity.
Municipal bonds are subject and market and interest rate risk and potentially capital gains tax if sold prior to maturity. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Municipal bonds are federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply.
Preferred stock dividends are paid at the discretion of the issuing company. Preferred stocks are subject to interest rate and credit risk. They may be subject to a call features.
Alternative investments may not be suitable for all investors and involve special risks such as leveraging the investment, potential adverse market forces, regulatory changes and potentially illiquidity. The strategies employed in the management of alternative investments may accelerate the velocity of potential losses.
Mortgage backed securities are subject to credit, default, prepayment, extension, market and interest rate risk.
High yield/junk bonds (grade BB or below) are below investment grade securities, and are subject to higher interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks than those graded BBB and above. They generally should be part of a diversified portfolio for sophisticated investors.
Precious metal investing involves greater fluctuation and potential for losses.
The fast price swings of commodities will result in significant volatility in an investor’s holdings.
This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial LLC.
Not Insured by FDIC/NCUA or Any Other Government Agency | Not Bank/Credit Union Deposits or Obligations | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value
For Public Use – Tracking: #1065924
